About the Post

Author Information

Najmtek is a technology start-up, created in 2014, client company of the Houston Technology Center. By commercializing the virtualization of technical hardware and external devices into software applications, Najmtek designs the future of mobile computing while being responsible custodians of the planet. Najmtek has created a powerfully dynamic hardware and software tool, named the UBook, a universal notebook, which delivers a more advanced set of functionalities. Ubook is the premier innovative hybrid IT device of 2016, Top 50 in technology 2016: the first multi-touch, multi-language, multi-accessory and multi-function laptop. Ubook is all-in-one, intuitive and fully customizable. Ubook perfectly fits all your communication and device input needs, regardless of language, and it even supports the special requirements of the disabled user. Ubook is a single machine infinitely transformable with a single touch, streamlining the way we live and work. Najmtek changes the way users interact with their technology as they participate in and contribute to the world. The only limitation is the user’s imagination.

Apple / Samsung battle in CA: the Verdict

After deliberating for 21 hours and 37 minutes, the jury in the Apple v. Samsung trial reached a verdict on Friday in the San JOSE, California court .

The nine jurors decided unanimously that Samsung had infringed on Apple’s intellectual property. However, the Cupertino firm won’t be getting the more than $2.5 billion it asked for, it will be getting at least $1,049,343,540.

Jurors sorted through 28 different Samsung devices and five Apple devices to decide whether each infringed multiple patents. You will find below details patent by patent:

On utility patents:

  • Patent 163 (related to a double tap method to zoom in on an element such a picture): the answer is yes for all but the Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Nexus S 4G, Transform, Intercept, and Vibrant.
  • Patent 381 (concerning drop-down lists, translation of documents, scaling and rotation on a touch screen): the answer is yes for all devices. Samsung infriges Apple’s patent,
  • Patent 915 (concerning scroll operations and functionality of “pinch and zoom”): the answer is yes for all except the Ace, Intercept, and Replenish,

On design patents:

  • Patent 087: Only 3 samsung devices are concerned, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, and Vibrant.
  • Patent 305 (related to the protection of the home screen of the iPhone): the answer is yes for all devices. Samsung infriges Apple’s patent,
  • Patent 677 (concerning iPhone design): the jury said “yes” to all devices for the front design except Galaxy Ace.
  • Patent 889 (related to iPad design): the jury ruled that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 WiFi and Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE did not infringe on the Apple’s design patent.

Samsung was quick to issue a comment to that effect. “Today’s verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer,” Samsung said in an official statement. “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. Consumers have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products.

The jurors left the courtroom without speaking to the media. Things may be over for now, but the next stage of legal machinations are already underway. A hearing about possible injunctions against Samsung products is set for September 20th, and Samsung has already vowed that “this is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims. Samsung will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer.

Samsung then gets 30 days to file an appeal, and it will probably use all of that time.

 
 
 
Image source:
http://www.tunandroid.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/applapple-vs-samsung-trial.jpg
http://c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Apple-vs-Samsung-lawsuit.jpg
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1314215/avs_jury_hands_in_the_verdict_560.jpg
http://gulfnews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1065949!/images11/478583745.jpg
http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/24/3266382/apple-vs-samsung-design-patent-infringment/in/3030480
 
 
Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: